<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Phoenix Family Law Attorney Blog | Arizona Divorce Lawyers | Chandler Child Custody Law Firm</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com,2009-12-03://2102</id>
    <updated>2011-12-16T19:54:51Z</updated>
    <subtitle>Phoenix legal blog shares AZ family law news about divorce, child custody, child support, marital asset and debt division and modification of orders.</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Enterprise 4.32-en</generator>

<entry>
    <title>Property Settlement Revisited: Vindication is Better Late Than Never</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/2011/12/property-settlement-revisited-vindication-is-better-late-than-never.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com,2011://2102.169653</id>

    <published>2011-12-22T12:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2011-12-16T19:54:51Z</updated>

    <summary>In a divorce case that seems made for TV, a high-profile mortgage lender is heading back to court to get his divorce case reopened and the property settlement modified. He&apos;s hoping that evidence gathered in a criminal case will enable...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Law Offices of Scott David Stewart</name>
        <uri>http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=2102&amp;id=2283</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="divorce" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="marital asset and debt division" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="modification of orders" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="divorce" label="divorce" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="modification" label="modification" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="propertydivision" label="property division" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In a divorce case that seems made for TV, a high-profile mortgage lender is heading back to court to get his divorce case reopened and the <a href="http://www.sdsfamilylaw.com/PracticeAreas/Modifications.asp" target="_blank">property settlement modified</a>. He's hoping that evidence gathered in a criminal case will enable him to prove to the family court judge once and for all that his ex-wife didn't deserve the exceeding large share that she received of the couple's property.</p>
<p>Ray Vinson is alleging that his ex-wife Deanna and her current husband conspired to discredit him and to damage his reputation in order to gain the upper hand in the couple's 2006 <a href="http://www.sdsfamilylaw.com/PracticeAreas/Divorce.asp" target="_blank">divorce</a>. The wife received more than $61 million in marital property (which included the couple's mortgage business), while Vinson was awarded only $11.5 million.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>In his trip to court this time, Vinson will be bringing with him evidence gained in a criminal case involving his ex-wife's bodyguard and other private investigators who were recently found guilty of racketeering, engaging in a conspiracy to defraud Vinson, and acting with malicious conduct. In that criminal case, Vinson was awarded a half million dollars in damages.</p>
<p>Although his ex-wife wasn't a party to the criminal case, Vinson is charging that she used evidence "procured by fraud and intimidation" to build her case against him in divorce court.</p>
<p>For example, through financial incentives and intimidation, a woman lied under oath to obtain a restraining order against Vinson, saying that she had had an affair with him and that he was dangerous and abusive. Although the woman hadn't then testified in court, the judgment entered into the family court record listed certain actions that Vinson had not admitted to but that had been among the misrepresented facts provided by witnesses employed by his ex-wife.</p>
<p>Vinson believes these misrepresentations were a significant factor in the judge awarding such a large settlement. He hopes that with the facts of the criminal case in hand, the judge will see differently.</p>
<p>Source: St. Louis Today, "<a href="http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/metro/pitchman-vinson-uses-nevada-verdict-to-revisit-high-stakes-divorce/article_7e1c152b-19d2-565b-9a57-fc7c6250e2b0.html">Pitchman Vinson uses Nevada verdict to revisit high-stakes divorce</a>," by Nicholas Pistor, December 7, 2011.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Military Divorce High; Some Fear Greater Increase as Soldiers Return Home</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/2011/12/military-divorce-high-some-fear-greater-increase-as-soldiers-return-home.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com,2011://2102.169614</id>

    <published>2011-12-19T19:10:38Z</published>
    <updated>2011-12-16T19:14:03Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[--"USA Today" reported that the divorce rate has reached its highest level since 1999. The overall divorce rate was 3.7 percent (the civilian divorce rate is 3.5 percent). While individual units of the military had different rates&nbsp;-- Air Force divorce...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Law Offices of Scott David Stewart</name>
        <uri>http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=2102&amp;id=2283</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="divorce" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="divorce" label="divorce" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="militarydivorce" label="military divorce" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>--"USA Today" reported that the <a href="http://www.sdsfamilylaw.com/PracticeAreas/Divorce.asp" target="_blank">divorce </a>rate has reached its highest level since 1999. The overall divorce rate was 3.7 percent (the civilian divorce rate is 3.5 percent).</p>
<p>While individual units of the military had different rates&nbsp;-- Air Force divorce (3.9 percent), Marine divorce (3.8 percent), Army divorce (3.7 percent) and Navy (3.6 percent)&nbsp; no one unit of the military has consistently held the highest rate. In 2006, Navy enlisted had the highest rate and Marines the lowest. (Officers consistently have lower rates of divorce than enlisted.)</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The military personnel who have consistently had the highest rates of divorce are women. And that is not new data. Military women are more than twice as likely to be divorced as military men, whether enlisted or officers.</p>
<p>In 2011, nearly 10 percent of enlisted women were divorced. In 2006, it was more than 7 percent, according to Rand Corp. researcher Benjamen Karney, who studies military divorce.</p>
<p>While there are no clearly identified reasons for this difference, though Karney has some ideas:</p>
<ul>
<li>Support services are generally geared toward the wives and children of male service members, not toward husbands.</li>
<li>There may be a difference in marriages of women who are in less traditional roles in society. (Military recruits tend to be the most traditional men and the least traditional women.) </li></ul>
<p>Some in the military are concerned that the rate of military divorce may rise again as soldiers return from the Middle East.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/military/story/2011-12-13/military-divorce-rate-increases/51888872/1">USA Today</a> and <a href="http://www.divorce360.com/divorce-articles/statistics/us/more-women-divorce-in-military.aspx?artid=796">Divorce360</a></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Dads and Child Custody</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/2011/12/dads-and-child-custody.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com,2011://2102.169611</id>

    <published>2011-12-16T19:05:53Z</published>
    <updated>2011-12-16T19:09:11Z</updated>

    <summary>According to the latest census data, 1.8 million men are single dads. And 32 percent of men with wives in the workforce said they were regularly caring for their children under age 15 (an increase of 6 percent over respondents...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Law Offices of Scott David Stewart</name>
        <uri>http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=2102&amp;id=2283</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="child custody" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="divorce" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="childcustody" label="child custody" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="divorce" label="divorce" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>According to the latest census data, 1.8 million men are single dads. And 32 percent of men with wives in the workforce said they were regularly caring for their children under age 15 (an increase of 6 percent over respondents in 2002). With these kinds of statistics, it seems like America has truly embraced fatherhood, but if you ask these active dads, many of them will say that they are still viewed with suspicion by the courts and by other parents.</p>
<p>For dad's seeking custody of a child in divorce or renegotiating an existing&nbsp;<a href="http://www.sdsfamilylaw.com/PracticeAreas/Child-Custody.asp" target="_blank">child&nbsp;custody</a> arrangement, demonstrating involvement in the child's life is essential.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<ul>
<li>How often do you take your child to activities and classes?</li>
<li>How often do you prepare your child's meals or put him or her to bed?</li>
<li>Do you and your child share a special hobby, sport or interest?</li>
<li>Do you know your child's friends? </li>
<li>Do you help with homework?</li></ul>
<p>More than ever dads can answer these questions affirmatively. Although many people still believe dads <em>always</em> get the short end of the stick in child custody, that's not the case.</p>
<p>"Working Mother" magazine reported that in contested custody cases in which the father seeks sole custody, he prevails at least 50 percent of the time. And the number of fathers awarded joint or primary child custody has doubled in the last decade.</p>
<p>While moms are still more likely to get primary custody, dads who want a larger role are more likely than ever to get it.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/vicki-larson/post_2708_b_1125346.html?ref=divorce">Huffington Post</a> and <a href="http://www.mainstreet.com/article/family/report-dads-taking-larger-role-childcare">Mainstreet.com</a></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Making Life Difficult for the Parent Who Owes Back Child Support </title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/2011/12/making-life-difficult-for-the-parent-who-owes-back-child-support.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com,2011://2102.164035</id>

    <published>2011-12-14T15:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2011-12-08T15:24:08Z</updated>

    <summary>In our last post we talked about actions that parents or the Arizona Department of Economic Security can take to get payment from a parent who owes back child support. But sometimes these efforts are not successful. A parent who...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Law Offices of Scott David Stewart</name>
        <uri>http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=2102&amp;id=2283</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="child support" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="backchildsupport" label="back child support" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="childsupport" label="child support" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In our last post we talked about actions that parents or the Arizona Department of Economic Security can take to get payment from a parent who owes back <a href="http://www.sdsfamilylaw.com/PracticeAreas/Child-Support.asp" target="_blank">child support</a>. But sometimes these efforts are not successful. A parent who is intent on not paying the support they owe can put their property in another person's name, may not file a tax return, or may work strictly for cash.</p>
<p>There are other actions a custodial parent or the DCSE can take to make life difficult for the non-paying parent. Sometimes this can compel the parent to finally live up to his or her obligation to a child.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<ul>
<li><strong>Bad mark on a credit report</strong>: Unpaid child support shows up on a credit report, making it hard to get loans and credit. If the non-paying parent operates a business, this can create problems. </li>
<li><strong>License suspension</strong>: If you've been owed child support for six months or more, DCSE can suspend the non-paying parent's professional or occupational license <em>without</em> taking them to court. This could be a realtor's license, a construction license, or a driver's license. DCSE can also suspend or revoke a hunting license or fishing license. </li>
<li><strong>Passport denial</strong>: If more than $2,500 is owed in support, the U.S. Secretary of State can refuse to issue a passport or can revoke a passport.</li>
<li><strong>Contempt of court</strong>: Child support is a court order. Failing to pay support is contempt of a court order, which can result in jail time.</li>
<li><strong>Criminal charges</strong>: Depending upon the amount owed, the non-payer could face misdemeanor or felony criminal charges.</li></ul>
<p>If you've lost a job, had a pay cut, or other life challenges have made it difficult for you to pay support, don't ignore the problem. Talk to an Arizona family law attorney who can help you get support reduced or develop a payment plan to move forward without the risk of arrest.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.azcourts.gov/familylaw/ChildSupportFrequentlyAskedQuestions.aspx" target="_blank">Arizona Courts website</a> and <a href="https://www.azdes.gov/main.aspx?menu=24&amp;id=2496" target="_blank">Arizona Department of Economic Security website</a></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Having Trouble Getting the Child Support You Are Owed?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/2011/12/having-trouble-getting-the-child-support-you-are-owed.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com,2011://2102.163991</id>

    <published>2011-12-12T15:02:46Z</published>
    <updated>2011-12-08T15:26:15Z</updated>

    <summary>So you&apos;ve gone to court and the judge ordered child support for your children, and yet you are having difficulty getting that support in full, month after month. What can you do? There are a variety of actions that a...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Law Offices of Scott David Stewart</name>
        <uri>http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=2102&amp;id=2283</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="child support" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="childsupport" label="child support" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="garnishment" label="garnishment" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="seizure" label="seizure" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>So you've gone to court and the judge ordered <a href="http://www.sdsfamilylaw.com/PracticeAreas/Child-Support.asp" target="_blank">child support</a> for your children, and yet you are having difficulty getting that support in full, month after month. What can you do? There are a variety of actions that a parent or the Arizona Department of Economic Security can take to compel a parent to make child support payments, including:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Wage collection</strong>: DCSE will send an order to an employer to withhold current support and may order an additional amount for back support that is owed</li></ul>]]>
        <![CDATA[<ul>
<li><strong>Interception of funds</strong>: If you are owed $50 or more in back child support, DCSE can intercept the other parent's state tax refund and send it to you. Federal taxes can be intercepted for a parent on TANF when more than $150 is owed. Lottery winnings, unemployment insurance benefits, workers' comp benefits, social security payments and veteran's benefits can also be taken. (The amount of benefits that can be diverted varies depending upon the type of payment. Talk to a child support lawyer for details.) </li>
<li><strong>Liens on property</strong>: A parent or DCSE can put a lien on personal property like houses and cars owned by the parent who owes back support, making it hard to resell.</li>
<li><strong>Bank account and other asset seizure</strong>: You can get a court order to take money from bank accounts, trust companies and mutual funds.</li></ul>
<p>Each of these enforcement actions has its own rules regarding how much money and how long the money has been owed before action can be taken. Your child support attorney can explain which options are available in your specific case. There are also non-financial actions that can be taken to put pressure on a non-paying parent, which we will discuss in our next post.</p>
<p>If you are a parent behind on your child support, don't ignore the problem. Talk to an Arizona family law attorney who can help you get support reduced or develop a payment plan to move forward without the risk of asset seizure or arrest.</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.azcourts.gov/familylaw/ChildSupportFrequentlyAskedQuestions.aspx" target="_blank">Arizona Courts website</a> and <a href="https://www.azdes.gov/main.aspx?menu=24&amp;id=2496" target="_blank">Arizona Department of Economic Security website</a></p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Census Finds More Parents Owed Back Child Support</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/2011/12/census-finds-more-parents-owed-back-child-support.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com,2011://2102.163868</id>

    <published>2011-12-09T15:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2011-12-08T05:16:03Z</updated>

    <summary>Some 22 million children under the age of 21 rely upon child support from a non-custodial parent. A new report from the U.S. Census Bureau casts light on the plight of these children, the majority of whom are not getting...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Law Offices of Scott David Stewart</name>
        <uri>http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=2102&amp;id=2283</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="child support" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="childsupport" label="child support" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Some 22 million children under the age of 21 rely upon <a href="http://www.sdsfamilylaw.com/PracticeAreas/Child-Support.asp" target="_blank">child support</a> from a non-custodial parent. A new report from the U.S. Census Bureau casts light on the plight of these children, the majority of whom are not getting the support they are due.</p>
<p>In 2009, just 41 percent of custodial parents received the full amount of child support owed to them. Only half of those custodial parents reported having a court order in place to receive child support from a non-custodial parent. About 9 percent of parents had an informal arrangement for payment, which could include health insurance and other types of assistance.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>This is just the beginning of bad news, as the report shows that an increasing number of custodial parents - overwhelmingly mothers - are finding themselves living below poverty level. More than 28 percent of custodial parents with children are living in poverty, up from 23 percent in 2001.</p>
<p>It is your child's right to receive financial and emotional support from both of his or her parents. A family law attorney can help you secure the child support your child needs to thrive by helping you bring your case for support to family court.</p>
<p>Source: Mainstreet.com, "<a href="http://www.mainstreet.com/article/family/parents-finding-it-harder-get-full-child-support-payments" target="_blank">Parents Finding it Harder to Get Full Child Support Payments</a>," by Kristin Colella, December 7, 2011.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Messy Child Custody Case Gets Messier</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/2011/12/creating-dirt-for-divorce-court.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com,2011://2102.163870</id>

    <published>2011-12-08T05:04:13Z</published>
    <updated>2011-12-08T05:08:34Z</updated>

    <summary>A California man involved in a messy child custody dispute is now in court seeking punitive damages against his estranged wife, a private investigator, a police sheriff and deputy, and several others. He is charging civil rights violations, bad faith...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Law Offices of Scott David Stewart</name>
        <uri>http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=2102&amp;id=2283</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="child custody" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="childcustody" label="child custody" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A California man involved in a messy <a href="http://www.sdsfamilylaw.com/PracticeAreas/Child-Custody.asp" target="_blank">child custody dispute</a> is now in court seeking punitive damages against his estranged wife, a private investigator, a police sheriff and deputy, and several others. He is charging civil rights violations, bad faith arrest, false imprisonment, abuse of process, intentional affliction of emotional distress and constitutional violations.</p>
<p>The man says that his wife wanted him to look bad to the court in the child custody case so she hired a private investigator who arranged for him to be arrested for drunk driving.</p>
<p>The private investigator worked with a number of other people to ply the man with drinks. When he left the bar, the investigator called a sheriff's deputy, who promptly arrested him.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Months later one of the parties to the set-up emailed the man and apologized for his role in the event, explaining what had happened.</p>
<p>The deputy's partner allegedly was told by the deputy that the plaintiff needed to be "dirtied up" before a court date and that the arrest was a set up. The man is further charging that this isn't the first time the deputy has arrested someone on a "dirty DUI."</p>
<p>If this claim is found to be true, this wife's attempt to get the upper hand in family court&nbsp;is likely to&nbsp;backfire terribly.</p>
<p>Source: Courthouse News, "<a href="http://www.courthousenews.com/2011/12/05/41934.htm" target="_blank">Man claims deputy was in on dirty arrest</a>," by Chris Marshall, December 5, 2011</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Why One Researcher Says Co-parenting is Worth the Effort</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/2011/12/why-one-researcher-says-co-parenting-is-worth-the-effort.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com,2011://2102.160964</id>

    <published>2011-12-03T15:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2011-12-01T19:13:02Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Fathers are important to a child's development.&nbsp;Whether you are involved in a child custody case right now, or your divorce is long past but you are having trouble co-parenting, the work of Dr. Warren Farrell affirms that the hard work...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Law Offices of Scott David Stewart</name>
        <uri>http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=2102&amp;id=2283</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="child custody" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="family law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="childcustody" label="child custody" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="coparenting" label="coparenting" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="sharedcustody" label="shared custody" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Fathers are important to a child's development.&nbsp;Whether you are involved in a <a href="http://www.sdsfamilylaw.com/CM/Articles/Child-Custody-Parenting-Plans-and-Best-Interests-of-the-Child.asp" target="_blank">child custody case</a> right now, or your divorce is long past but you are having trouble co-parenting, the work of Dr. Warren Farrell affirms that the hard work of setting aside your differences and putting your children first can pay off.</p>
<p>Dr. Farrell is a psychologist and author of the book <em>Father Child Reunion</em>. He has spent more than a decade analyzing research from around the world to understand why children who have regular contact with their fathers do so much better in 26 different areas of life than those who don't.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>It starts in infancy. Boy babies who have regular contact with their fathers display more trust at five and six months of age. They had more mental competence and better motor skills.</p>
<p>That enforcer role that dads so often take? It's part of teaching empathy by enforcing boundaries and respect for the rights of others. Dr. Farrell found that dads play a critical role in teaching delayed gratification.</p>
<p>While Dr. Farrell says growing up in two-parent families is in children's best interests, if divorce is inevitable there are three things parents can do to ensure children grow up almost as well:</p>
<ol>
<li>Create a child custody agreement that allows your child to spend significant - equal or almost equal - time with each parent.</li>
<li>Live nearby so your child can continue his or her activities and friendships while spending time with both parents. Dr. Farrell suggests living within 15 minutes proximity.</li>
<li>Do not bad-mouth the other parent!</li></ol>
<p>For your children's sake, it pays to work on making co-parenting successful so your child has the benefit of both parents.</p>
<p>Source: First Things First, "<a href="http://firstthings.org/page/media/the-family-column/bringing-daddy-home" target="_blank">Bringing Daddy Home</a>."</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Divorce or Annulment in the Works for Humphries-Kardashian?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/2011/12/divorce-or-annulment-in-the-works-for-humphries-kardashian.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com,2011://2102.161023</id>

    <published>2011-12-01T18:57:06Z</published>
    <updated>2011-12-01T19:02:12Z</updated>

    <summary>Although Kim Kardashian filed for divorce a month ago, citing irreconcilable differences with her NBA-star husband, Kris Humphries, Mr. Humphries filed papers in court this week asking for an annulment of the 72-day marriage. His reason? Fraud. Humphries will have...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Law Offices of Scott David Stewart</name>
        <uri>http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=2102&amp;id=2283</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="divorce" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="annulment" label="annulment" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="divorice" label="divorice" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Although Kim Kardashian filed for <a href="http://www.sdsfamilylaw.com/PracticeAreas/Divorce.asp" target="_blank">divorce</a> a month ago, citing irreconcilable differences with her NBA-star husband, Kris Humphries, Mr. Humphries filed papers in court this week asking for an annulment of the 72-day marriage. His reason? Fraud.</p>
<p>Humphries will have to prove that there was "deception regarding a significant matter." So far it's unknown what that fraud might be though unnamed sources told TMZ that the marriage itself was a fraud, staged to benefit Kardashian's reality TV show.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>She says not so, and furthermore, the two of them had talked to a lawyer about annulment before she filed divorce papers and they were told it wasn't an option because they didn't meet the conditions for an annulment.</p>
<p>In California, a couple can get their marriage annulled only if they can prove:</p>
<ul>
<li>Bigamy</li>
<li>Incest</li>
<li>One spouse was underage and did not have parental consent to marry</li>
<li>Mental illness</li>
<li>Fraud</li>
<li>Force or threat</li>
<li>Inability to physically consummate the marriage</li></ul>
<p>With their courtship and wedding open for public viewing, will he be able to make the case that there was fraud? Well have to see what the family court judge says.</p>
<p>Source: Huffington Post, "<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/11/30/kris-humphries-annulment-_n_1121223.html?ncid=edlinkusaolp00000003" target="_blank">Kris Humphries Annulment? The NBA Star's Next Move</a>," 11/30/11</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Prenups: Helping Your Business Dodge a Bullet in Divorce</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/2011/11/prenups-helping-your-business-dodge-a-bullet-in-divorce.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com,2011://2102.157727</id>

    <published>2011-11-23T15:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2011-11-21T21:32:23Z</updated>

    <summary>Prenuptial agreements are not only for the wealthy. If you own a successful business - even if you only hope that your start-up business will one day be successful - there are several good reasons why a prenuptial agreement can...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Law Offices of Scott David Stewart</name>
        <uri>http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=2102&amp;id=2283</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="divorce" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="marital asset and debt division" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="prenup" label="prenup" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="prenuptialagreement" label="prenuptial agreement" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="propertydivision" label="property division" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Prenuptial agreements are not only for the wealthy. If you own a successful business - even if you only hope that your start-up business will one day be successful - there are several good reasons why a prenuptial agreement can benefit you and your company in the event you get <a href="http://www.sdsfamilylaw.com/PracticeAreas/Divorce.asp" target="_blank">divorced</a>.</p>
<p>A business is a complex asset. It may be treated like any other pre-existing asset brought into the marriage and viewed as the property of the business owner. But often the other spouse did work for the business at some point during the marriage, or in some other way contributed to the success of the business. This may muddy the waters in terms of ownership.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>The prenuptial agreement should not only clarify ownership of a business, it should also provide guidance as to the division of the appreciated value of the business since the start of the marriage. Some couples may agree to jointly share the appreciated value; in other cases, the business owner may wish to keep the business fully insulated from the marriage, protecting its financial integrity.</p>
<p>A prenuptial agreement can also include instruction regarding valuation of stock in the business.</p>
<p>Even if a prenuptial agreement exists, there are several factors that can weaken the contract, making it vulnerable to being overturned in court.</p>
<ul>
<li>Do not use threats to get your future spouse to sign the contract or your spouse may be able to claim duress. </li>
<li>Give the other party sufficient time to review the contract in advance of the wedding, ideally with the assistance of a lawyer.</li>
<li>Make sure the language is clear and all assets and debts have been fully described, so that the other party cannot say there was fraud.</li></ul>
<p>A prenuptial agreement should make the work of <a href="http://www.sdsfamilylaw.com/PracticeAreas/Property-Debt-Settlement.asp" target="_blank">property division</a> easier, not tie up your business and personal affairs in a lengthy legal battle.</p>
<p>Source: Forbes, "<a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/evangelinegomez/2011/11/02/protecting-your-business-in-a-divorce-pre-nuptial-agreement/" target="_blank">Protecting Your Business in a Divorce: Prenuptial Agreement</a>," by Evangeline Gomez, November 2, 2011.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Divorce Court Decision Rests on What&apos;s Seen AND What&apos;s Said</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/2011/11/divorce-court-decision-rests-on-whats-seen-and-whats-said.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com,2011://2102.157704</id>

    <published>2011-11-21T21:26:01Z</published>
    <updated>2011-11-21T21:28:55Z</updated>

    <summary>A recent column in the Huffington Post offered useful advice to people soon to be appearing in divorce court. A Colorado lawyer reminded parties in divorce that the judge is going to reach a decision based not only on the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Law Offices of Scott David Stewart</name>
        <uri>http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=2102&amp;id=2283</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="child custody" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="divorce" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="childcustody" label="child custody" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="divorce" label="divorce" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="divorcecourt" label="divorce court" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>A recent column in the Huffington Post offered useful advice to people soon to be appearing in divorce court. A Colorado lawyer reminded parties in <a href="http://www.sdsfamilylaw.com/PracticeAreas/Divorce.asp" target="_blank">divorce</a> that the judge is going to reach a decision based not only on the evidence your attorney presents, but also on the things YOU do and say in court. Don't work against yourself. For example:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Behave yourself!</strong> Real court is not like court TV. Most judges have a short fuse when it comes to clients who roll their eyes, mutter, go off on tangents, have verbal outbursts or otherwise fail to contain themselves in court. If your ex-partner infuriates you by lying on the stand, write your frustrations on a piece of paper and give it to your attorney. Let your divorce attorney handle it - that's why you hired him or her.</li></ul>]]>
        <![CDATA[<ul>
<li><strong>Dress appropriately</strong>, by which we mean, dress for a court of law. You don't have to wear a suit, but be sure the clothing you choose is clean and not revealing.</li>
<li><strong>Divorce is not a team sport. </strong>If you need support during this difficult time, bring one or two people with you, but leave the cheerleading squad at home. You don't want other people's behavior in court to affect the judge's decision.</li>
<li><strong>Present yourself as a reasonable person.</strong> It's particularly important, if you are seeking <a href="http://www.sdsfamilylaw.com/PracticeAreas/Child-Custody.asp" target="_blank">joint or sole custody of a child</a>, that you not be allow yourself to be excessively negative about the other parent. If you can't find one good thing to say about your ex, how will you be able to support his or her ongoing relationship with your children? By recognizing your former partner's good points, the judge can see that you may be capable of co-parenting. </li>
<li><strong>Don't let your attorney get surprised</strong> by unflattering, negative information. It's your divorce attorney's job to represent your case in a positive (and truthful) light. He or she can't be prepared to do that if you are not honest about the negative information that your ex may say in court. </li>
<li><strong>NEVER text message or take phone calls in court</strong>. </li></ul>
<p>It's understandable that you may be nervous if you have to appear in divorce court. Your lawyer is here to help you understand courtroom procedures and to advise you on the best way to present yourself and your case.</p>
<p>Source: Huffington Post, "<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/edra-j-pollin/my-top-ten-list-of-what-n_b_1096630.html?ref=divorce" target="_blank">My Top Ten List of What Not to Do in Divorce Court</a>," by Edra Pollin, November 21, 2011.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Facebook in Family Court</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/2011/11/facebook-in-family-court.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com,2011://2102.155578</id>

    <published>2011-11-18T18:00:21Z</published>
    <updated>2011-11-15T18:44:32Z</updated>

    <summary>We&apos;ve said it before, we&apos;ll say it again. Social media is a double-edged sword when it comes to getting evidence in divorce cases. In March of 2011, a report by the American Academy of Matrimonial lawyers stated that over the...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Law Offices of Scott David Stewart</name>
        <uri>http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=2102&amp;id=2283</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="child custody" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="divorce" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="childcustody" label="child custody" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="divorce" label="divorce" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="facebook" label="facebook" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>We've said it before, we'll say it again. Social media is a double-edged sword when it comes to getting evidence in <a href="http://www.sdsfamilylaw.com/PracticeAreas/Divorce.asp" target="_blank">divorce</a> cases.</p>
<p>In March of 2011, a report by the American Academy of Matrimonial lawyers stated that over the past five years, it has seen a tremendous increase in the use of social media posts in divorce court. An AAML report said that 80 percent of divorces now include social media posts, primarily from Facebook. Social network websites provide more evidence of infidelity and lies than any other source.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>Lawyers often ask for social media updates to be gathered as evidence. In a recent Connecticut divorce case, a family law judge went the extra step of ordering the two parties to share their passwords to Facebook and other online accounts.</p>
<p>The husband had asked for access to her Facebook account after hearing that she had shared concerns about her ability to care for her children. That would be extremely relevant information for the upcoming <a href="http://www.sdsfamilylaw.com/PracticeAreas/Child-Custody.asp" target="_blank">child custody</a> decision. The judge went one further and ordered her to give up her passwords to eHarmony and Match.com. But the same order went to the husband, who also had to share his passwords.</p>
<p>Some commentators questioned whether a judge could order a person to violate the service agreement between the user and the social media site, which precludes the sharing of passwords. But whether a judge orders it or not, social media posts are already a fixture in the courtroom.</p>
<p>Source: Mobiledia, "<a href="http://www.mobiledia.com/news/116320.html" target="_blank">Facebook Passwords Must Be Shared in Divorce Case</a>," by Margaret Rock, November 11, 2011.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Whose Home for the Holidays? Flexibility is Key to Workable Child Custody Arrangements</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/2011/11/whose-home-for-the-holidays-flexibility-is-key-to-workable-child-custody-arrangements.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com,2011://2102.155467</id>

    <published>2011-11-16T15:00:00Z</published>
    <updated>2011-11-15T16:13:44Z</updated>

    <summary>Holidays are a stressful time for many people, but for couples in the process of divorce or who have recently divorced, stress can take on new meaning. Busy schedules and travel plans may be doubly conflicted. And past disagreements about...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Law Offices of Scott David Stewart</name>
        <uri>http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=2102&amp;id=2283</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="child custody" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="divorce" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="childcustody" label="child custody" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="divorce" label="divorce" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="holidays" label="holidays" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="visitation" label="visitation" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Holidays are a stressful time for many people, but for couples in the process of <a href="http://www.sdsfamilylaw.com/PracticeAreas/Divorce.asp" target="_blank">divorce</a> or who have recently divorced, stress can take on new meaning. Busy schedules and travel plans may be doubly conflicted. And past disagreements about religious or family traditions may be magnified. Needless to say, none of this will help children have a happy holiday.</p>
<p>In an article in the Huffington Post, family therapist Marie Hartwell-Walker says flexibility is the key to a stress-free season (okay, maybe not stress free, but certainly less stressed). She offers this advice to parents.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<ul>
<li><strong>Be flexible about dates</strong>: Yes, you have a <a href="http://www.sdsfamilylaw.com/PracticeAreas/Child-Custody.asp" target="_blank">child custody agreement</a> that says you have your child on this date at this time, but if out-of-town ex-relatives suddenly decide to visit, do you really want to say your child can't see them? You might be better off taking a deep breath and choosing to be flexible with dates. Your child will have a much more enjoyable time with you and his or her other parent if the two of you can work together to accommodate changed circumstances. Focus on your children's experience and know that whether they see you on the 24<sup>th</sup> or the 25<sup>th</sup> is not as important as being happy when you are together. (On the other hand, if your ex makes a habit of asking you to give up your time, sticking to that legal agreement may be essential.)</li>
<li><strong>Be flexible about traditions</strong>: Your former spouse may have been the driving force with past family activities and now you feel a bit adrift. Rather than worrying about keeping everything the same, acknowledge that there will be some changes and introduce some new, fun activities into your holiday. But do try to provide continuity as well. </li>
<li><strong>Be flexible about who is included in celebrations</strong>: If you are just getting divorced, sitting down to Thanksgiving dinner with the ex may be too much to ask, but as time goes by you may find your holiday table can stretch to include all the grandparents or your children's favorite aunts and uncles. Think about the important people in your child's life. Their relationship to you may have changed, but their relationship to your child has not. There is no law that says you can't invite them over on Christmas. </li></ul>
<p>Source: Huffington Post, "<a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marie-hartwellwalker-edd/divorced-parenting-during_b_1093420.html" target="_blank">Divorced Parenting During the Holiday Season: Flexibility is the Key</a>," by Marie Hartwell-Walker, November 15, 2011.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Don&apos;t Miss Out on Tax Deductions After Divorce</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/2011/11/dont-miss-out-on-tax-deductions-after-divorce.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com,2011://2102.154879</id>

    <published>2011-11-14T15:00:08Z</published>
    <updated>2011-11-14T07:27:10Z</updated>

    <summary>No one is excited about being ordered to pay alimony after a divorce, but at least alimony is tax deductible to the person paying it. Just be sure you understand how the IRS views your payments to your ex and...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Law Offices of Scott David Stewart</name>
        <uri>http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=2102&amp;id=2283</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="child support" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="divorce" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="alimony" label="alimony" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="childsupport" label="child support" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="divorce" label="divorce" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>No one is excited about being ordered to pay alimony after a <a href="http://www.sdsfamilylaw.com/PracticeAreas/Divorce.asp" target="_blank">divorce</a>, but at least alimony is tax deductible to the person paying it. Just be sure you understand how the IRS views your payments to your ex and document, document, document. Here are a few things you should know about tax deductions for alimony.</p>
<ul>
<li>Alimony can include a number of things, in addition to cash, checks or money orders. For example, if you made payments on a life insurance policy your ex owns, that can be deducted.</li></ul>]]>
        <![CDATA[<ul>
<li>If you make payments to a third party on your ex-spouse's behalf (for example, a mortgage payment, tuition or a medical expense), you need documentation. Your spouse must ask for the third-party payment in writing and you must have received this request before you file your tax return.</li>
<li>If you jointly own a property, you may be able to deduct half of the expenses but you should consult a tax attorney to ensure this deduction applies in your case.</li>
<li>If you transfer property to your ex in lieu of a financial transfer, you cannot deduct the value of that property.</li></ul>
<p>Remember, <a href="http://www.sdsfamilylaw.com/PracticeAreas/Child-Support.asp">child support</a> is NOT tax deductible. It's best not to entangle alimony payments or property transfers with child support, which could muddy the water and lead to potential IRS problems.</p>
<p><strong>Source</strong>: Business Insider, "<a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/heres-how-to-lessen-alimonys-financial-sting-2011-10#ixzz1dewVyp9j" target="_blank">Ten Steps to Take Advantage of Your Alimony Tax Deduction</a>," by Madeleine Scinto, October 30, 2011.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Preparing for Divorce? Resist the Urge to Spy</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/2011/11/preparing-for-divorce-resist-the-urge-to-spy.shtml" />
    <id>tag:www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com,2011://2102.154588</id>

    <published>2011-11-14T03:56:53Z</published>
    <updated>2011-11-14T07:28:04Z</updated>

    <summary>Hidden cameras, listening devices, spying software - there are a host of technologies available to spy on the nanny, the children, the spouse. But that really may not be a good idea if you are thinking of using the information...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Law Offices of Scott David Stewart</name>
        <uri>http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/mt-bin/mt-cp.cgi?__mode=view&amp;blog_id=2102&amp;id=2283</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="divorce" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="family law" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="divorcecourt" label="divorce court" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="spying" label="spying" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.azdivorceattorneyblog.com/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Hidden cameras, listening devices, spying software - there are a host of technologies available to spy on the nanny, the children, the spouse. But that really may not be a good idea if you are thinking of using the information you gain in <a href="http://www.sdsfamilylaw.com/PracticeAreas/Divorce.asp" target="_blank">divorce</a> court. In some states, husbands and wives have found themselves facing hefty fines for violating the law. Worse yet, the evidence may be found inadmissible in court.</p>
<p>There are laws regarding the privacy of electronic communications and phone calls. If you use surveillance equipment to spy on your spouse's online activities or to secretly record phone calls, you may find yourself on the wrong side of those laws.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<ul>
<li>Getting others to do the dirty work could also result in legal problems if you knowingly hire someone to break the law while gathering evidence, such as:</li>
<li>Calling the phone company and pretending to be someone else</li>
<li>Secretly recording your spouse's phone calls or conversations (a federal violation)</li>
<li>Hacking into your spouse's work computer to check their email (hacking into a home account is likely not to be a problem if the home computer is used by both spouses)</li></ul>
<p>Technology-related privacy violations generally fall under the Federal Wiretapping Act, but that Act couldn't anticipate all the technologies available today. So enterprising spousal spies may find themselves in court as a test case if a soon-to-be ex challenges their spying procedures. It's wise to let you divorce attorney advise you or to gather the evidence you need to make your case through lawful discovery.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
